Skip to main content
Navigating Uncertain Futures: Dilemmas and Opportunities in Climate and Health in LMICs

Navigating Uncertain Futures: Dilemmas and Opportunities in Climate and Health in LMICs

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Gareth Priday, Jose Ramos, Frederick Ato Armah, Mey Jurdi, Martin Muchangi, Gina Polo-Infante, Tin Tin Su, Yaser Abunnasr, Nazia Ahmad, Lauren Brown, David Teye Doku, Melina Galdos, Rima Habib, Simon Hearn, Rawya Khodor, Adelaide Lusambili, Stephen J. McCall, Samuel Muhula, Walter Mukwana, David Olaya, Vincent Pagiwa, Hussein Mohammad Rizal, Aminath Shazly, Tan Pei Jean, Anita Villacis, Anya Gopfert, Holly Gray, Montasser Kamal, Natacha Lecours, Samuel Oji Oti, Robert McLean

Abstract

Climate-health planning in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) is constrained by structural health-system vulnerabilities, cross-sectoral coordination challenges, and trade-offs that remain invisible within sectoral planning processes. This study addresses three methodological gaps: the scarcity of multi-regional, LMIC-led climate-health futures; the absence of methods that translate foresight into decision-making dilemmas; and the lack of approaches that integrate participatory foresight with structured intersectoral perspective-taking. A participatory futures workshop with 29 climate, health and funding experts drawn from five regional research locations across Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Caribbean, and the Middle East used the serious game ‘Future Care Force’ to negotiate intersectoral responses across divergent ten-year scenarios. To our knowledge, this was a first-of-its-kind gathering of Global South expertise in climate and health. The consensus between experts on climate and health trajectories underlies fundamental uncertainties and the need to examine alternative futures. A serious game provides a platform to imagine divergent climate and health futures, participants worked through epistemic complexity to reveal dilemmas and opportunities. The analysis identifies four cross-cutting structural dilemmas: technology deployment, knowledge authority, system architecture, and pace of change. The study positions serious games a method for making cross-sectoral trade-offs visible, an epistemic precondition for adaptive pathway development.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/X50V4J

Subjects

Environmental Public Health, Medicine and Health Sciences, Public Health

Keywords

Climate- health, low-and middle-income countries, adaptive pathways, serious games, foresight, co-production

Dates

Published: 2026-10-21 05:32

Last Updated: 2026-10-21 05:32

License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Conflict of interest statement:
The Future Care Force game is made publicly available for free use and adaptation in climate and health research and teaching. The game is freely available and adaptable under a creative commons licence. No author currently derives financial benefit from its use or distribution. The authors note that the game’s public availability does not preclude individual authors offering paid training, facilitation, or consulting services using the game in the future; any such arrangements would be independent of the research reported here and the game will continue to remain in open access should such action be taken. Natacha Lecours, Montasser Kamal, Sam Oti, Robert McLean are employed by the International Development Research Centre, Anya Gopfert and Holly Gray are employed by the UK Foreign and Commonwealth Development Office both of which fund the ARCH initiative from which study participants and co-producers were drawn. Gareth Priday and Jose Ramos received funding for this study through a competitive grant from IDRC.

Metrics

Views: 30

Downloads: 3