This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.
Development of a Combined Detection and Relocation Workflow (TM2DD) to Characterize Escalating Hydraulic Fracturing Induced Seismicity in the Karnes Trough Fault Zone of the Eagle Ford Shale Play, Texas
Downloads
Authors
Abstract
On January 30, 2025, an M4.7 earthquake shook the Eagle Ford Shale, Texas, the region's second M4 event in under eighteen months. Unlike much of the central United States, where induced seismicity stems from wastewater disposal, most of the earthquakes in the Eagle Ford are linked to hydraulic fracturing (HF) (Fasola et al., 2019; Fasola & Brudzinski, 2023). If HF-induced, the 2025 event would be the largest such earthquake in the United States, amid seismicity increasing in both magnitude and frequency. The seismicity appears to be associated with mapped normal faults in the Karnes Trough Fault Zone (KTFZ), but its detailed pattern and relationship to HF operations remain poorly characterized. This study leverages ~5 years of continuous TexNet recordings (~25 km station spacing) to better detect and locate this seismicity. We have developed a workflow (TM2DD) that integrates multistation template matching with automated per-template correlation thresholds, refines phase arrivals via template-detection cross correlation, and applies double-difference relocation using a local 1-D velocity model. This expands the detected catalog by 17.5-fold, with relocations revealing that the 2023 M4.0 and 2025 M4.7 sequences ruptured adjacent fault segments with 15-20 degree differences in dip angle. In addition, the larger event occurred at the deeper extent of the seismically active zone. All detected sequences correlate tightly in space and time with active HF wells within 3.5 km, with the deeper 2025 event showcasing mainshock - aftershock behaviour, whereas the shallower 2023 sequence is swarm-like. These results indicate that HF-induced seismicity in the KTFZ can propagate along adjacent, connected fault systems as nearby operations continue, with deeper segments potentially hosting larger, mainshock-dominated ruptures.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31223/X5WZ4N
Subjects
Earth Sciences, Geophysics and Seismology
Keywords
Induced Seismology
Dates
Published: 2026-10-21 21:14
Last Updated: 2026-10-22 17:11
License
Additional Metadata
Conflict of interest statement:
None
Data Availability:
The TM2DD workflow, with all the following processes, is available at (https://github.com/JamesKirchenwiitz/Enhanced_Detection_Relocation) and will be archived upon final submission. Earthquake hypocenters were obtained from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Comprehensive Catalog (ComCat; https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/search/, last accessed April 2026), to which TexNet contributes its locations, and were cross referenced against the publicly available TexNet Earthquake Catalog (https://texnet.beg.utexas.edu/, last accessed April 2026) to ensure consistency across both sources. Phase arrival times were retrieved from TexNet as publicly available QuakeML files. Continuous waveform data from the Texas Seismological Network (TX) were obtained through Earthscope and are publicly available (https://ds.iris.edu/ds/nodes/dmc/data/). Data from stations EF53, EF55, EF61, EF72, and EF73 were downloaded following their one-year embargo expired and are now publicly available. Double-difference relocation was per
Metrics
Views: 2
Downloads: 0
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.