This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.
Tracking Progress in General-Purpose VLMs and Agents for Earth Observation
Downloads
Authors
Abstract
The rapid advancement of vision-language models (VLMs) and agent-based workflows is expanding their potential for Earth observation (EO). Existing studies primarily compare models at a single point in time, providing limited insight into how their capabilities evolve across generations. To address this gap, we conduct a longitudinal evaluation of 48 VLMs across successive generations using a benchmark comprising 13 EO tasks, examining both overall EO performance and individual task capabilities. We investigate the effects of prompting strategies, task-specific fine-tuning, agent-based inference, and reasoning effort, as well as its association with model parameter count. Results reveal substantial but uneven progress in the EO capabilities of general-purpose VLMs. Object classification, scene understanding, and object counting improve markedly, while change detection and precise localization also improve but remain challenging. Few-shot prompting and task-specific fine-tuning provide performance gains, whereas chain-of-thought and increased reasoning effort sometimes degrade model performance. Holding the underlying model fixed, autonomous agent-based inference significantly improves GPT-6 Astra's overall EO score (+4.59 points; p=0.025), with the largest gains in object counting and change detection. These findings demonstrate that model evolution and improved execution workflows are advancing the EO capabilities of general-purpose VLMs, while fine-grained visual perception and spatial reasoning remain major challenges.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31223/X5024M
Subjects
Artificial Intelligence and Robotics, Remote Sensing, Sustainability
Keywords
AI agents, Earth observation, longitudinal evaluation, vision-language models
Dates
Published: 2026-11-10 07:00
Last Updated: 2026-11-10 07:00
License
CC BY Attribution 4.0 International
Additional Metadata
Conflict of interest statement:
None
Data Availability:
https://doi.org/10.21227/7zqe-3b78
Metrics
Views: 105
Downloads: 3
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.