Skip to main content
Irrigation-driven land subsidence on the Barind Tract, northwest Bangladesh: two-track Sentinel-1 InSAR, GNSS-tied time series and spatially cross-validated explainable machine learning

Irrigation-driven land subsidence on the Barind Tract, northwest Bangladesh: two-track Sentinel-1 InSAR, GNSS-tied time series and spatially cross-validated explainable machine learning

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Farheen Zaman , Ashfaq Raveed

Abstract

The Barind Tract of northwest Bangladesh is the country’s most intensively
groundwater-irrigated region, yet its ground motion has been measured only at
isolated points. We processedascendinganddescendingSentinel-1small-baseline
InSAR networks for 2017–2025, referenced them to a continuous GNSS station
and converted line-of-sight rates to vertical velocity. In the ascending track, co
herent land subsides at a median of −10.1 mmyr−1 (median formal uncertainty
0.58 mm yr−1, plus a common ±1.7 mmyr−1 GNSS-tie uncertainty), and 51% of
it subsides faster than 10 mm yr−1. Rates reach −11.2 ± 1.2 mmyr−1 at Godagari
on the Barind margin, against −1.8 ± 1.1 mmyr−1 on the active Ganges flood
plain; 1-km block medians from the two tracks correlate at 𝑟 = 0.56. GLDAS-2.2
groundwater storage declined by 7.2±1.2 mmyr−1, and the fitted seasonal ground
low lags the April storage minimum by three to four months, consistent with de
layed aquitard drainage. An ERA5 tropospheric correction changed velocities by
a median of 0.03 mm yr−1 and shifted this timing by at most three weeks at three of
four sites. Randomforest andXGBoostmodelsexplain37–47%ofthespatialvariance under 5-km spatial block cross-validation; random cross-validation inflates 𝑅2 by 0.09–0.13, and omitting ramp removal raises it to 0.69. SHAP effects with
the same direction in both tracks identify elevation, built-up density and local Boro
irrigation intensity as robust controls. Subsidence removes at least 25 million m3
of ground volume per year, of the same order as the groundwater-storage decline,
and601km ofmainroadsand101km of railway lieongroundsubsidingfasterthan
10 mm yr−1. Spatial cross-validation and cross-track consistency should precede
physical interpretation of machine-learning attributions of subsidence.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/X50Z4K

Subjects

Education, Engineering

Keywords

Land subsidence, InSAR, Groundwater irrigation, Barind Tract, Explainable machine learning, Spatial cross-validation, InSAR, INSAR, Groundwater irrigation, Barind Tract, Explainable machine learning, Spatial cross-validation

Dates

Published: 2026-11-11 23:05

Last Updated: 2026-11-11 23:05

License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Conflict of interest statement:
The authors declare no known competing financial interests or personal rela tionships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Data Availability:
All input data are publicly available from their providers: Sentinel-1 SAR (Alaska Satellite Facility), GNSS time series (Nevada Geodetic Laboratory), GRACE/GRACE-FO mascons (NASA JPL), GLDAS-2.2 (NASA GES DISC), Sentinel-2, CHIRPS, SoilGrids, ESA WorldCover, JRC Global Surface Water and MODIS (Google Earth Engine), geology (USGS Open-File Report 97-470-H), Boro statistics (Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics) and roads (OpenStreetMap). The derived velocity grids and processing scripts will be deposited in a public repository (Zenodo) on journal publication and are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Metrics

Views: 35

Downloads: 3