Testing the effect of bioturbation and species abundance upon discrete-depth individual foraminifera analysis

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 2 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

Comment #25 Bryan C. Lougheed @ 2021-04-08 17:10

The editor at "Palaeoceanography and Palaeoclimatology" invited us to resubmit the manuscript, but we will reformat it and resubmit it to another journal. Will update the PDF when that happens.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Bryan C. Lougheed, Brett Metcalfe

Abstract

We use a single foraminifera enabled, holistic hydroclimate-to-sediment transient modelling approach to fundamentally evaluate the efficacy of discrete-depth individual foraminifera analysis (IFA) for reconstructing past sea surface temperature (SST) variability from deep-sea sediment archives, a method that has been used for, amongst other applications, reconstructing El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO). The computer model environment allows us to strictly control for variables such as sea surface temperature (SST), foraminifera species abundance response to SST, as well as depositional processes such as sediment accumulation rate (SAR) and bioturbation depth (BD), and subsequent laboratory processes such as sample size and machine error. Examining a number of best-case scenarios, we find that IFA-derived reconstructions of past SST variability are sensitive to all of the aforementioned variables. Running 100 ensembles for each scenario, we find that the influence of bioturbation upon IFA-derived SST reconstructions, combined with typical samples sizes employed in the field, produces noisy SST reconstructions with poor correlation to the original SST distribution in the water. This noise is especially apparent for values near the edge of the SST distribution, which is the distribution region of particular interest for, e.g., ENSO. The noise is further increased in the case of increasing machine error, decreasing SAR and decreasing sample size. We also find poor agreement between ensembles, underscoring the need for replication studies in the field to confirm findings at particular sites and time periods. Furthermore, we show that a species’ abundance response to SST could in theory bias IFA-derived SST reconstructions, which can have consequences when comparing IFA-derived SST from markedly different mean climate states. We provide a number of idealised simulations spanning a number of SAR, sample size, machine error and species abundance scenarios, which can help assist researchers in the field to determine under which conditions they could expect to retrieve significant results.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/X5W01V

Subjects

Earth Sciences, Geology

Keywords

modeling, modelling, ENSO, paleoceanography, IFA, palaeoceanography

Dates

Published: 2020-10-22 21:59

Last Updated: 2021-10-01 16:16

Older Versions
License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International