Floods on alluvial fans: implications for reworking rates, morphology and fan hazards

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 2 of this Preprint.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Anya Leenman , Brett Eaton , Lucy G MacKenzie 

Abstract

Flood events are the agents of change on alluvial fans. However, most alluvial fan experiments have used constant flows to model fans and the channels upon them. Here, we present results from a series of alluvial fan experiments with different patterns of flow variation (i.e. different hydrograph shapes). We conducted experiments with 1) constant flow, 2) alternating high and low flows, 3) a moderate flood peak that decayed slowly, alternating with a constant low flow, and 4) a high flood peak that decayed rapidly, alternating with a constant low flow. Importantly, all experiments had the same mean flow and sediment supply, but the different hydrographs generated fans with different slopes. In addition, higher peak flows led to increased lateral migration rates and increased erosion and deposition. These results challenge the notion that a single representative flow can be used to approximate the geomorphic effects of a range of flows in a natural stream. Moreover, the data suggest that hydrograph shape can govern the geomorphic impact of a flood event. Our findings indicate how altered basin hydrology (for instance, through changes to land cover) could influence geomorphic change and natural hazards on alluvial fans.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/X52035

Subjects

Earth Sciences, Geomorphology, Physical Sciences and Mathematics

Keywords

Structure-from-Motion photogrammetry, Experimental geomorphology, Flood response, Hydrograph, Representative discharge, Structure-from-Motion photogrammetry, Alluvial fans Experimental geomorphology, Flood response, Hydrograph, Representative discharge

Dates

Published: 2021-07-26 19:47

Last Updated: 2021-07-26 23:47

Older Versions
License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Conflict of interest statement:
None.

Data Availability (Reason not available):
The data underlying all figures in this manuscript are available from the Canadian Federated Research Data Repository (FRDR) at https://doi.org/10.20383/102.0482.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.