This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. The published version of this Preprint is available: https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JB026653. This is version 2 of this Preprint.
Downloads
Supplementary Files
Authors
Abstract
Uncertainty in present-day glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) rates represents at least 44% of the total gravity-based ice mass balance signal over Antarctica. Meanwhile, physical couplings between solid Earth, sea level and ice dynamics enhance the dependency of the spatiotemporally varying GIA signal on three-dimensional variations in mantle rheology. Improved knowledge of thermomechanical mantle structure is therefore required to refine estimates of current and projected ice mass balance. Here, we present a Bayesian inverse method for self-consistently mapping shear-wave velocities from high-resolution adjoint tomography into thermomechanical structure using calibrated parameterisations of anelasticity at seismic frequency. We constrain the model using regional geophysical data sets containing information on upper mantle temperature, attenuation and viscosity structure. Our treatment allows formal quantification of parameter covariances, and naturally permits propagation of material parameter uncertainties into thermomechanical structure estimates. We find that uncertainty in steady-state viscosity structure at 150 km depth can be reduced by 4-5 orders of magnitude compared with a forward-modelling approach neglecting covariance between viscoelastic parameters. By accounting for the dependence of viscosity on loading timescale, we find good agreement between our estimates of mantle viscosity beneath West Antarctica, and those derived from satellite GPS. Direct access to temperature structure allows us to estimate lateral variations in lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary (LAB) depth, geothermal heat flow (GHF), and associated uncertainties. We find evidence for shallow LAB depths (63 ± 13 km), and high GHF (76 ± 7 mW m^-2) beneath West Antarctica, suggesting a highly dynamic response to ice mass loss.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31223/X5C35R
Subjects
Earth Sciences, Geophysics and Seismology, Mineral Physics, Physical Sciences and Mathematics, Statistical Methodology
Keywords
anelasticity, Bayesian inverse methods, geothermal heat flow, glacial isostatic adjustment, lithosphere-asthenosphere dynamics, mantle rheology
Dates
Published: 2022-05-19 20:56
Last Updated: 2023-03-27 17:04
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.