This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.
Downloads
Authors
Abstract
In a recent paper by Palcu et al. (2021: Scientific Reports 11, Art. Nr.: 11471), the Cape Panagia section on the Taman peninsula (Russian Black Sea) was dated using magnetostratigraphy, in order to calibrate the timing of previously published regressions of the Paratethys megalake. The authors of the paper claim that this “largest megalake in the geological record” experienced four major desiccation episodes in the period between 9.75 and 7.65 million years ago. In our opinion, the conclusions drawn in this contribution are not always fully justified, and reflect a somewhat selective approach to existing data. The sedimentological and biostratigraphic record of Cape Panagia does not lend itself to interpretation as reflecting major lake-level drops. The observed changes in the depositional record might be explained by other factors, such as regression due to filling of the accommodation space, or local uplift of the area. None of these, however, were considered, being simply excluded from the options. The lack of convincing evidence for the high-resolution events described in the region, compounded by inconsistencies in the paleogeographic reconstructions, give rise to concern about the reliability of the model presented in the paper.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31223/X5865V
Subjects
Earth Sciences, Geology, Oceanography, Paleobiology, Paleontology, Sedimentology, Stratigraphy, Tectonics and Structure
Keywords
comment, Paratethys, sequence stratigraphy, Late Miocene, Black Sea, selective approach to data, water-level fluctuations
Dates
Published: 2022-05-27 08:20
License
CC BY Attribution 4.0 International
Additional Metadata
Conflict of interest statement:
The authors declare no competing interests.
Data Availability (Reason not available):
The article is a comment.
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.