Is the Aftershock Zone Area a Good Proxy for the Mainshock Rupture Area?

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 4 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Supplementary Files
Authors

Jing Ci Neo, Yihe Huang, Dongdong Yao, Shengji Wei

Abstract

The locations of aftershocks are often observed to be on the same fault plane as the mainshock and used as proxies for its rupture area. Recent developments in earthquake relocation techniques have led to great improvements in the accuracy of earthquake locations, offering an unprecedented opportunity to quantify both the aftershock distribution and mainshock rupture area. In this study, we design a consistent approach to calculate the area enclosed by aftershocks of Mw≥5.4 mainshocks in California, normalized by the mainshock rupture area derived from slip contours. We also investigate the Coulomb stress change from mainshock slip and compare it to the aftershock zone. We find that overall, the ratios of aftershock zone area to mainshock rupture area, hereinafter referred to as “aftershock ratio”, lie within a range of 0.5 to 5.4, with most values larger than 1. Using different slip inversion models for the same mainshock can have a large impact on the results, but the ratios estimated from both the relocated catalogs and Advanced National Seismic System (ANSS) catalog have similar patterns. The aftershock ratios based on relocated catalogs of Southern California fall between 0.5 and 4.3, while they exhibit a wider range from 1 to 5.4 for Northern California. Aftershock ratios for the early aftershock window (within 1 day) show a similar range but smaller values than using the entire aftershock duration, and we propose that continuing afterslip could contribute to the expanding aftershock zone area following several mainshocks. Our results show that areas with positive Coulomb stress change scale with aftershock zone areas, and spatial distribution of aftershocks represents stress release from mainshock rupture and continuing postseismic slip.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/osf.io/cp9vn

Subjects

Earth Sciences, Geophysics and Seismology, Physical Sciences and Mathematics

Keywords

aftershocks, aftershock area, california, rupture area

Dates

Published: 2020-04-06 15:22

Last Updated: 2020-08-20 19:07

Older Versions
License

GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL) 2.1