Groundwatersheds of protected areas reveal globally overlooked risks and opportunities

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. The published version of this Preprint is available: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-023-01086-9. This is version 3 of this Preprint.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Supplementary Files
Authors

David Serrano, Xander Huggins , Tom Gleeson, Sam Zipper , Florian Jehn, Melissa M. Rohde, Robin Abell, Kari Vigerstol, Andreas Hartmann 

Abstract

Protected areas are a key tool for conserving biodiversity, sustaining ecosystem services and improving human well-being. Global initiatives that aim to expand and connect protected areas generally focus on controlling ‘above ground’ impacts such as land use, overlooking the potential for human actions in adjacent areas to affect protected areas through groundwater flow. Here, we assess the potential footprint of these impacts by mapping groundwatersheds. We find that over five in six protected areas globally (85%) have groundwatersheds that are underprotected. Half of all protected areas have a groundwatershed with a spatial footprint that lies predominantly (i.e., at least 50%) outside of the protected area’s boundary. These findings highlight a widespread potential risk to protected areas from activities affecting groundwater within their groundwatersheds, underscoring the need for groundwatershed-based protection measures. Delineating groundwatersheds can catalyze needed discussions about protected area connectivity and robustness, and investments in groundwatershed conservation and management can help protect groundwater-dependent ecosystems from external threats.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/X59354

Subjects

Natural Resources and Conservation, Water Resource Management

Keywords

Groundwatershed, Protected areas, Global

Dates

Published: 2022-09-23 20:19

Last Updated: 2023-04-19 01:36

Older Versions
License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.