This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. The published version of this Preprint is available: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-41131-x. This is version 1 of this Preprint.
Downloads
Authors
Abstract
We quantify potential air pollution exposure reductions resulting from U.S. federal carbon policy, and consider the implications of resulting health benefits for exposure disparities across racial/ethnic groups. We assess reductions in carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions of 50% in 2030 relative to 2005 levels, comparable in magnitude to the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act. Using energy-economic scenarios and an air quality model, we find reductions in average fine particulate matter (PM2.5) exposure across racial/ethnic groups under a carbon pricing policy, with greatest benefit for non-Hispanic Black and white populations. However, the average relative gap in exposure between white people and people of color widens. Alternative choices of sources that reduce a similar amount of CO2 emissions also cannot substantially mitigate these disparities. Our results suggest that fully mitigating exposure disparities between white and non-white populations will require efforts beyond optimization of existing CO2 policy strategies, including large-scale structural changes.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31223/X5J93M
Subjects
Atmospheric Sciences, Environmental Indicators and Impact Assessment, Environmental Sciences, Sustainability
Keywords
air quality disparities, environmental justice, climate policy, air quality, energy-economic modeling
Dates
Published: 2022-10-22 02:22
Last Updated: 2022-10-22 07:34
License
CC BY Attribution 4.0 International
Additional Metadata
Conflict of interest statement:
None
Data Availability (Reason not available):
Data will be made available upon peer-reviewed publication
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.