Knowledge co-production for decision-making in human-natural systems under uncertainty

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. The published version of this Preprint is available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102727. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Supplementary Files
Authors

Enayat A. Moallemi , Fateme Zare, Aniek Hebinck, Katrina Szetey, Edmundo Molina-Perez, Romy Zyngier, Michalis Hadjikakou , Jan Kwakkel, Marjolijn Haasnoot, Kelly K. Miller, David Groves, Brett A. Bryan

Abstract

Decision-making under uncertainty is important for managing human-natural systems in a changing world. A major source of uncertainty that challenges decisions is rooted in their multi-actor settings, i.e., the poorly understood societal actors with diverse values, complex relationships, and conflicting management approaches. Despite general agreement across disciplines on co-producing knowledge for viable and inclusive outcomes in multi-actor settings, there is still limited conceptual clarity and no systematic understanding on what co-production means in decision-making under uncertainty and how it can be achieved. Here, we use content analysis and clustering to systematically analyse 50 decision-making cases with multiple time and spatial scales across 26 countries and in 9 different sectors in the last decade to serve two aims. The first is to synthesise the key recurring approaches that underpin high quality decision co-production across many cases of diverse features. The second is to identify important deficits and opportunities to leverage existing approaches towards flourishing co-production in supporting decision-making. We find that four general approaches emerge centred around: promoting innovation for robust and equitable decisions; broadening the span of co-production across interacting systems; fostering social learning and inclusive participation; and improving pathways to impact. Additionally, five key areas that should be addressed to improve decision co-production are identified in relation to: participation diversity; social learning; power relationships; governance inclusivity; and transformative change. Characterising the emergent approaches and their key areas for improvement can help guide future works towards more pluralistic and integrated science and practice.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/X5JP9P

Subjects

Environmental Studies

Keywords

Co-production, stakeholder, sustainability, socio-ecological system, transdisciplinary

Dates

Published: 2022-12-14 15:56

Last Updated: 2022-12-14 20:56

License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Conflict of interest statement:
None

Data Availability (Reason not available):
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7426011