This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. The published version of this Preprint is available: https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2023.3322595. This is version 3 of this Preprint.
Downloads
Authors
Abstract
The estimation of displacement vectors for (objects on) the Earth’s surface using satellite InSAR requires geometric transformations of the observables based on orbital viewing
geometries. Usually, there are insufficient viewing geometries available for full 3D reconstruction, leading to non-unique solutions. Currently, there is no standardized approach to deal with this problem, resulting in products that are based on haphazard
and/or oversimplified assumptions with biased estimates and reduced interpretability. Here we show that a clear definition of—and subsequent adherence to—enabling conditions guarantees the validity and quality of displacement vector estimates leading to standardized interferometric products with improved interpretability. We introduce the concept of the null line as a key metric for InSAR geometry and bias estimation, assess its impact and orientation for all positions on Earth, and propose a novel reference system that is inherently unbiased. We evaluate current operational practice, leading to a taxonomy of frequently encountered misconceptions and to recommendations for InSAR product generation and interpretation. We also propose new subscript notation to uniquely distinguish different projection and decomposition products. Our propositions contribute to further standardization of InSAR product definition, improved map annotation, and robust interpretability.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31223/X55D37
Subjects
Engineering, Physical Sciences and Mathematics
Keywords
InSAR, surface displacements, line-of-sight, de- composition, null line, solution space, surface displacements, line-of-sight, decomposition, projection, null line, solution space
Dates
Published: 2022-12-14 10:27
Last Updated: 2023-10-12 14:00
Older Versions
License
CC BY Attribution 4.0 International
Additional Metadata
Conflict of interest statement:
None
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.