This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.
Downloads
Authors
Abstract
This study presents detrital zircon U-Pb ages of the Upper Bhander Sandstones from the Bhopal
inlier, and the overlying Cretaceous sandstones from Jabalpur, Central India. These data are combined with existing palaeobiological evidence to address the issue of lack of convergence between geochronology and biochronology of the Upper Vindhyan succession in central India. The age-spectra of Upper Bhander Sandstone show the dominance of detrital zircon population between 1500-1900 Ma, a subordinate cluster of 2400-2600 Ma, and a single youngest zircon
grain of ~770 Ma. These detrital zircon ages correlate with the timing of granite magmatism in
Bundelkhand, Aravalli and Central Indian Tectonic Zone (CITZ), implying their derivation
from these terranes. The finding of a single zircon of 770 + 12 Ma, supports the premise that
Vindhyan deposition extended in to the late Tonian. Cretaceous sandstones of the Jabalpur and
Lameta Formations contain zircon grains of ~550 Ma and ~700-800 Ma age. Except for the evidence from this youngest Vindhyan sedimentary sequence, no rocks of Late Neoproterozoic-Early Cambrian age have so far been reported from Central India, which can be correlated with these zircon ages. Comparable age-spectra of the Upper Bhander and the
Cretaceous sandstones indicates that the proximal Vindhyan sandstones could have supplied
detritus to these younger sandstones. These Cretaceous sandstones also constitute a window to
understand the geology of the pre-Cretaceous eroded terrain, and support the premise that the
Vindhyan sedimentation did not terminate at 1000 Ma.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31223/X5D94R
Subjects
Physical Sciences and Mathematics
Keywords
Bhopal Vindhyan inlier; Detrital Zircons; Tonian; Upper Bhander Sandstone; Vindhyan Basin
Dates
Published: 2023-02-12 15:42
License
Additional Metadata
Conflict of interest statement:
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.