Comment on ‘Unintentional unfairness when applying new greenhouse gas emissions metrics at country level’

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. The published version of this Preprint is available: http://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac02eb. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Michelle Cain , Keith Shine, Dave Frame, John Lynch, Adrian Macey, Raymond Pierrehumbert, Myles Robert Allen

Abstract

Here, we provide a comment in response to a recently published paper ‘Unintentional unfairness when applying new greenhouse gas emissions metrics at country level’ by Rogelj and Schleussner (2019). We note a number of errors in their critique of the use of GWP* to relate cumulative and short-lived climate pollutants, argue that their logic is flawed, their ethical considerations are narrow and their conclusions not justified by the results presented.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/osf.io/r7epb

Subjects

Environmental Sciences, Other Environmental Sciences, Physical Sciences and Mathematics

Keywords

carbon dioxide equivalence, climate policy

Dates

Published: 2019-12-13 07:54

License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International