N-S versus E-W extension in the Tibetan plateau: Are they driven by the same dynamics?

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Giridas maiti, Arnab Roy , Nibir Mandal

Abstract

The tectonic history of the Himalaya-Tibet Mountain Range records two important extensional tectonic events: 1) N-S extension in the Himalaya-Tibet transition zone, and 2) E-W extension in the southern and central Tibet, manifested in the form of east-west and north-south striking normal faults, respectively. The N-S extensional event (~22 Ma) started to commence earlier than the E-W extension (~18 Ma) and phased out by ~11 Ma, whereas the E-W extension continued to recent time (~4 Ma), suggesting a temporally overlapping period of ~7 Myr. This article addresses the question- did they originate from the same dynamical process? Using numerical and laboratory experiments, we show that a decreasing India-Asia convergence velocity induced gravitational collapse of the Tibetan plateau is the main driving force for both the extensional tectonic events, but they were controlled by two different mechanisms. Our results show that with a drop in the convergence velocity southern Tibet underwent gravitational collapse due to pressure relaxation in the underlying Himalayan wedge, and the collapse forced the deep crustal materials to extrude up, creating N-S extension (22 – 11 Ma) along the Himalaya-Tibet transition zone. On the other hand, presence of rigid Tarim block in north-western Tibet caused differential topographic uplifts from west to east, resulting in a first-order eastward topographic gradient of 0.1º during the initial fast-stage of India-Asia collision (> 22 Ma). Later on, this topographic slope prompted eastward crustal flows in the course of gravitational collapse, leading to E-W extensional tectonics (~18 - 4 Ma) in Tibet.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/X5766X

Subjects

Earth Sciences, Physical Sciences and Mathematics

Keywords

India-Eurasia collision, Gravity collapse, Crustal flow velocity, Laboratory modelling, Strain-rate tensor

Dates

Published: 2023-03-25 11:47

Last Updated: 2023-03-25 18:47

License

CC-BY Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Conflict of interest statement:
None

Data Availability (Reason not available):
The authors confirm that all the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article. The GPS data used for comparison of model results are available in Zhang et al. (2004), Gan et al. (2007), and Zheng et al. (2017).