This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. The published version of this Preprint is available: https://doi.org/10.1017/RDC.2024.5. This is version 2 of this Preprint.
Downloads
Authors
Abstract
The long-standing assumption that aboveground plant litter inputs have a substantial influence on soil organic carbon storage (SOC) and dynamics has been challenged by a new paradigm for SOC formation and persistence. We tested the importance of plant litter chemistry on SOC storage, distribution, composition, and age by comparing two highly contrasting ecosystems: an old-growth coast redwood (Sequoia sempervirens) forest, with highly aromatic litter, and an adjacent coastal prairie, with more easily decomposed litter. We hypothesized that if plant litter chemistry was the primary driver, redwood would store more and older SOC that was less microbially processed than prairie. Total soil carbon stocks to 110 cm depth were higher in prairie (35 kg C m-2) than redwood (28 kg C m-2). Radiocarbon values indicated shorter SOC residence times in redwood than prairie throughout the profile. Higher amounts of pyrogenic carbon and a higher degree of microbial processing of SOC appear to be instrumental for soil carbon storage and persistence in prairie, while differences in fine-root carbon inputs likely contribute to younger SOC in redwood. We conclude that at these sites fire residues, root inputs, and soil properties influence soil carbon dynamics to a greater degree than the properties of aboveground litter.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31223/X5N370
Subjects
Life Sciences
Keywords
soil oganic matter, soil carbon, radiocarbon, density fraction, grassland, forest soil, 13C-NMR specroscopy
Dates
Published: 2023-04-14 09:13
Last Updated: 2024-02-14 13:58
Older Versions
License
CC-By Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Additional Metadata
Data Availability (Reason not available):
will be available upon acceptance of manuscript for publication
Comment #145 Karis Jensen McFarlane @ 2024-02-14 11:29
This paper was published online 2/12/2024 by the journal Radiocarbon and can be found here (Open Access): https://doi.org/10.1017/RDC.2024.5