Effects of off-fault inelasticity on near-fault directivity pulses

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. The published version of this Preprint is available: http://doi.org/10.1029/2019JB019074. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

This Preprint has no visible version.

Download Preprint

Download Preprint

Supplementary Files

Yongfei Wang , Steven M. Day


Near-fault motion is often dominated by long-period, pulse-like particle velocities with fault-normal polarization that, when enhanced by directivity, may strongly excite mid- to high-rise structures. We assess the extent to which plastic yielding may affect amplitude, frequency content, and distance scaling of near-fault directivity pulses. Dynamic simulations of 3D strike-slip ruptures reveal significant plasticity effects, and these persist when geometrical fault roughness is added. With and without off-fault yielding, these models (~ M 7) predict fault-normal pulse behavior similar to that of observed pulses (periods of 2-5 seconds, amplitudes increasing with rupture distance until approaching a limit), but yielding systematically reduces pulse amplitude and increases the dominant period. Yielding causes near-fault (< ~2 km) peak ground velocity (PGV) to saturate with respect to increases in both stress drop and epicentral distance, and at small distance to rupture, yielding may contribute significantly to the observed magnitude saturation of PGV. The results support the following elements for functional forms in empirical pulse models: (i) a fault-normal distance saturation factor, (ii) a period-dependent and along-strike distance-dependent factor representing directivity, and (iii) an along-strike saturation factor to truncate growth of the directivity factor. In addition to the foregoing effects on long-period fault-normal pulses, the model with off-fault plasticity is very efficient in suppressing the high-frequency fault-parallel acceleration pulses that otherwise develop when local supershear rupture transients occur. The latter result may explain, at least in part, the absence of an observable Mach wave signature from supershear rupture.




Civil and Environmental Engineering, Engineering, Geotechnical Engineering



Published: 2019-11-27 15:56


Academic Free License (AFL) 3.0

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.