Formulating and Solving the Data-Consistent Geophysical Inverse Problem for Subsurface Modeling Applications

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 2 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Alex Miltenberger , Lijing Wang, Tapan Mukerji, Jef Caers

Abstract

Today, most probabilistic geophysical inverse problems are formulated using one of two methods: (1) conditional probability and Bayes’ Theorem, or (2) Tarantola’s theory of intersecting probability densities. More recently, a third inverse problem formulation based on pushforward probability measures was proposed, termed “data-consistent inversion”. Many practical problems can be cast into any of these three formulations, but the choice of formulation may change the posterior. To help geophysicists understand how the formulation affects the posterior, we present a mathematical comparison of the three formulations accompanied by simple physical example to illustrate the difference between posteriors from each method. The distinguishing feature of the data-consistent formulation is that it yields a posterior that maps onto the measurement distribution, whereas the traditional formulations do not. Then we propose a flexible Sequential Monte Carlo algorithm for solving practical subsurface modeling problems conditioned to geophysical data. This algorithm uses density estimation techniques to fit a generative probabilistic model to the posterior. The algorithm is demonstrated using a synthetic gravity inversion example. The results are then compared to results from the classical Bayesian formulation solved using Markov Chain Monte Carlo. The comparison shows that even though the difference between the data-consistent posterior and Bayesian posterior can be small in practice, the lack of conditional probabilities in the data-consistent formulation can make it simpler to fit generative probabilistic models to the solution of the inverse problem.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/X50W9S

Subjects

Earth Sciences, Geology, Geophysics and Seismology, Probability

Keywords

inverse problem, unertainty quantification, subsurface modeling

Dates

Published: 2023-05-26 23:29

Last Updated: 2023-05-29 10:22

Older Versions
License

CC-By Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Conflict of interest statement:
None

Data Availability (Reason not available):
https://github.com/ammilten/PushforwardMeasureGeophysics