This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.
Downloads
Supplementary Files
Authors
Abstract
Dike swarms are major continental structures recording large igneous provinces and crustal extension processes generating rifts and sedimentary basins. A key point in dike swarm studies is determining a minimum number of dikes that are necessary to explain the observed magnetic anomalies and inferences about position and depth for specific unities. We develop an automatic interpretation procedure to interpret the complex anomalies resulting from densely juxtaposed dikes forming a swarm, each dike with different depth and magnetization attributes. The automatic parameter estimation is based on the ratio of the amplitude of the magnetic anomaly (AMA) by its second-order derivative, the dike position and depth determined from simple algebraic expressions based on the thin-sheet model representation. The second derivative of the AMA serves to individualize intervals with specific dike units, thereby determining a minimum number of dikes based on their sharp or subtle concave-down expressions in the AMA profile. Tikhonov regularization is applied to prevent noise enhancement in evaluating numerical derivatives using a finite-difference scheme. A set of MATLAB programs are presented to evaluate the automatic interpretation of magnetic transects, a profile across the Ponta Grossa Dike Swarm in Southern Brazil serving as a testing data set since its results can be compared with a published dike model obtained from data inversion. Dike location and depth obtained with the automatic procedure accurately recover the model parameters obtained from nonlinear data inversion suggesting the utility of the proposed procedure to obtain a reliable model from complex anomalies.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31223/X5DH3F
Subjects
Geophysics and Seismology
Keywords
aeromagnetics, dike swarms, automatic interpretation, ParanĂ¡-Etendeka
Dates
Published: 2023-06-30 00:11
Last Updated: 2023-06-30 07:11
License
Additional Metadata
Conflict of interest statement:
None.
Data Availability (Reason not available):
Testing data set with the codes
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.