Independent estimates of net carbon uptake in croplands: UAV-LiDAR and machine learning vs. eddy-covariance

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 6 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Jaime C Revenga , Katerina Trepekli, Rasmus Jensen, Pauline Sophie Rummel, Thomas Friborg

Abstract

Understanding sequestration of organic carbon (C) in agroecosystems is of primary importance
for greenhouse gas (GHG) accounting in managed ecosystems, reducing the environmental footprint of land use, and inform crediting programs. However, a broader application of precise C accounting is currently constrained by a limited number of direct flux measurements. Aside well-studied ecosystems via the eddy covariance technique (EC), many still bear significant uncertainty. In this study, we propose and evaluate a method for estimating accumulated C stocks in agricultural sites, by assessing the plant aboveground carbon (AGC) throughout the growing season using unstaffed aerial vehicles and machine learning (ML) regression methods. Then, we benchmark these estimates with CO2 fluxes derived from the eddy covariance method from the ICOS DK-Vng site in Denmark. We utilized a light detection and ranging (LiDAR) sensor onboard an unstaffed aerial vehicle (UAV) to derive the structural characteristics of crops, and we conducted in parallel destructive field-based measurements of AGC. Then, we designed a ML pipeline to provide estimates of AGC as a supervised regression problem, using the LiDAR-derived point cloud data to extract predictive features and the AGC labels as ground-truth target values. The best performing ML model attained predictions of R2 = 0.71 and R2 = 0.93 at spatial resolutions of 1 m2 and 2 m2, respectively. The C content in the aboveground plant components was assessed via laboratory analysis (46.6 ± 0.3% of C-to-biomass in barley and 47.7 ± 0.3% in wheat), while the belowground components (root allocation and rhizodeposition) were estimated based on a phenology-dependent allometric ratio. The cumulative value of C uptake along the growing season (i.e. NPP) was compared with the difference of C predictions between every two UAV-LiDAR survey dates, finding an optimal disagreement between methods below ± 9% in two different cereal crops. The plant carbon budget in croplands, determined through UAV-LiDAR and machine learning regression, aligns with the carbon ecosystem uptake estimated through the eddy covariance technique, showcasing comparable results. Thereby, the proposed method also demonstrates the potential to estimate cumulative CO2 fluxes in areas lacking direct eddy covariance measurements. Various experimental setups are evaluated as well as the sources of uncertainty resulting from the sampling design.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/X52D6F

Subjects

Engineering, Life Sciences, Physical Sciences and Mathematics

Keywords

greenhouse gas, CO2, carbon, UAV, LiDAR, Eddy covariance, crops, machine learning

Dates

Published: 2023-08-30 00:00

Last Updated: 2023-12-07 12:48

Older Versions
License

CC-By Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Conflict of interest statement:
None declared

Data Availability (Reason not available):
Under responsible request.