This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 2 of this Preprint.
Downloads
Authors
Abstract
Since 2000, seven million acres have burned every year. Yet, since robust analytics are scarce, capitalizing on machine learning algorithms have the capability to bridge gaps in decision making and effective deployment. Despite this, a major limitation in current research is resolution and accuracy. Utilizing public data from NASA’s MODIS, LP DAAC, University of Idaho, and UC Irvine, 12 input features and 18,545 samples, the fire mask at day t+1 is predicted. Compared to existing datasets (FRY, FireAtlas, UCI Forest Fires, US Wildfires Catalog, Globfire and European Forest Fire Information System), this dataset contains the most variables at 1 km. resolution with the most input features. By treating the fire mask as binary and probability maps, regression and classification were performed. Several novel architectures were tested (ResNet, EfficientNet, RegNet and VGG19). A dataset scaling algorithm helped improve resolution by predicting data from existing points. The most optimal models were ResNet and Efficient Net, achieving a binary accuracy of 96.58%, precision of 72.37% and mean absolute error of 0.036. Compared to current studies, this study is around 38% more precise with 0.0142 lower mean absolute error, a significant improvement. Implementation regarding spread was implemented in two ways. With classification data and substituting resulting fire masks for previous ones, the spread of a wildfire could be mapped for various days. Additionally, with population density data and this spread, escape routes were also predicted.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31223/X5TM2T
Subjects
Engineering, Physical Sciences and Mathematics
Keywords
Wildfire Prediction, Deep Learning, Remote Sensing, Escape Routes, Dataset Augmentation, Deep learning, remote sensing, Escape Routes, Dataset Augmentation
Dates
Published: 2023-09-22 14:09
Last Updated: 2023-09-22 18:23
Older Versions
License
Additional Metadata
Conflict of interest statement:
The author declares that they have no conflict of interest in the conduction of this study.
Data Availability (Reason not available):
https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/fantineh/next-day-wildfire-spread
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.