This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. The published version of this Preprint is available: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-024-02011-4. This is version 1 of this Preprint.
Downloads
Authors
Abstract
Arctic permafrost, the largest non-seasonal component of Earth’s cryosphere, contains a significant climate-sensitive carbon pool. Its potential for loss due to climatic changes leading to a global tipping point, where thawing accelerates with disproportionate impacts, remains debated. Here, we provide an integrative perspective on this question, building on a cross-disciplinary meta-analysis of literature supported by geospatial analyses of global data products and climate model output. Contrary to the existence of a global-scale tipping point, scientific evidence suggests a quasi-linear response to global warming, both from observation-based and model-based projections. While certain processes, such as talik development, thermokarst, thermo-erosion, and vegetation interactions, can drive rapid local permafrost thaw and ground ice loss, they do not accumulate to a non-linear response beyond regional scales. We conclude that there is no safety margin for Arctic permafrost where its loss would be acceptable. Instead, with each increment of global warming, more land areas underlain by permafrost will proportionally experience thaw, causing detrimental local impacts and global feedbacks.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31223/X55X08
Subjects
Biogeochemistry, Climate, Earth Sciences, Geomorphology, Hydrology, Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology, Physical Sciences and Mathematics
Keywords
tipping point, Tipping element, permafrost thaw, Climate change impact
Dates
Published: 2023-09-25 07:32
Last Updated: 2023-09-25 14:32
License
CC-BY Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International
Additional Metadata
Conflict of interest statement:
None.
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.