Knowledge co-production for identifying sustainability indicators and prioritising solutions for food and land system transformation in Australia.

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 2 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Romy L Zyngier, Carla Leigh Archibald , Brett A. Bryan, Haley Lambert, Enayat Moallemi, Mark Elliot, Mark Lawrence, Jane Hutchinson, Lauren Bennett, Timothy Reeves, Matthew Pryor, Ulrika Lindholm, Sam Oakden, Stephanie J Watts-Williams, Gary Gale, Lei Gao, Michalis Hadjikakou 

Abstract

The sustainable transformation of food and land systems requires the rapid implementation and scaling up of a broad suite of solutions to meet the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Decision-making frameworks are needed to identify suitable indicators and prioritise solutions at national scales. Using a knowledge co-production framework, we convened 150 stakeholders from 100+ organisations to identify 18 nationally relevant indicators that aligned with critical SDGs describing a sustainable food and land system for Australia, in addition to 78 key solutions (supply- and demand-side) to enable progress against these indicators. We then asked subject matter experts to code the impact of each solution on each indicator using an adapted interaction mapping method accounting for uncertainty. The solution category ‘Protecting and restoring nature’, which included solutions targeting conservation and restoration, showed the highest potential for capturing synergies and avoiding trade-offs across multiple indicators. This category exhibited 34.6% of total major synergies, supporting the achievement of clean water and sanitation (SDG6), economic growth (SDG12), life under water (SDG14), and life on land (SDG15). The solution category ‘Carbon sequestration’, which included technological and biological carbon dioxide removal solutions, had the highest number of trade-offs with individual sustainability indicators (42.3%), particularly those relating to zero hunger (SDG2), wellbeing (SDG3), SDG6, SDG14 and SDG15. Our framework can be used to inform future research investment, support the prioritisation of solutions for quantitative modelling, and inform discussions with stakeholders and policymakers for transforming national-scale food and land systems in alignment with the SDGs.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/X5C97K

Subjects

Environmental Sciences

Keywords

sustainable development goals, Synergies, Trade-offs, regenerative agriculture, conservation, sustainable intensification

Dates

Published: 2023-10-10 02:41

Last Updated: 2024-06-06 18:30

Older Versions
License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Conflict of interest statement:
None

Data Availability (Reason not available):
Data will be made available upon request and will be within Supplementary Information when peer-reviewed publication is achieved.