This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. The published version of this Preprint is available: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2023.1320642. This is version 2 of this Preprint.
Downloads
Authors
Abstract
Macroalgae offshore cultivation and sinking is considered a potentially practical approach for ocean-based carbon dioxide removal. However, several considerations need to be resolved to assess the effectiveness and sustainability of this approach. Currently, several studies focus on the area required for climate-relevant carbon sequestration through macroalgae cultivation and sinking without considering realistic, global spatial limitations. This study uses a spatially-explicit suitability assessment model for optimised open-ocean afforestation and sinking site designation. By applying specific maritime, ecological and industrial constraints, two maps are produced: a) suitable areas for macroalgae offshore cultivation and sinking, and b) suitable areas for macroalgae sinking only (for sequestration purposes). These data provide a more realistic approach to quantifying the ocean surface (including the corresponding depths) required for macroalgae offshore cultivation and sinking within a spatially sustainable framework. The resulting maps estimate the respective suitability areas within the EEZs of the world countries. A total area suitable for macroalgae offshore cultivation and sinking is calculated at 10.8M km2, whereas sinking-only areas account for 32.8M km2 of the offshore ocean. The implications of spatial suitability patterns at global and national levels are discussed. We suggest that the concept of ‘grow nearshore, sink offshore’ should be explored as an alternative to offshore cultivation.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31223/X5Z40G
Subjects
Physical Sciences and Mathematics
Keywords
macroalgae, ocean afforestation, carbon dioxide removal, Suitability, spatial planning, mariculture, carbon sequestration
Dates
Published: 2023-10-17 06:12
Last Updated: 2023-11-30 06:36
Older Versions
License
CC-BY Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
Additional Metadata
Conflict of interest statement:
none
Data Availability (Reason not available):
Data will become available once the peer-review process is finished and the manuscript is published
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.