Forest carbon market-based mechanisms in India:  Learnings from global design principles and domestic barriers to implementation

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. The published version of this Preprint is available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.111331. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Anirban Roy, Manan Bhan 

Abstract

Forest carbon markets (FCMs) have emerged as a significant means to direct resources toward urgent climate action that can mobilize a large set of actors and catalyze funding toward reducing deforestation and promoting sustainable forest management. Here, we conduct a critical qualitative review of global academic and investigative literature to identify ten major sets of design principles that provide a platform for the functioning of carbon markets worldwide. From these, we pinpoint four design principles which may be relevant to future market-based mechanisms in India We propose that clarity over market-quality standards, comprehensive regulatory framework, minimization of transaction costs and upfront financing options, and flexibility in time-bound and spatial commitments would be fundamental to ensure that market-based mechanisms in India accrue sustainable and long-term benefits to climate action and human well-being. A successful market-based mechanism in India’s forestry sector would have to overcome challenges around land property rights, local implementation capacities and knowledge gaps, and incentive structures to ensure that it likely caters to the needs of all stakeholders while delivering socio-ecological benefits.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/X5B690

Subjects

Social and Behavioral Sciences

Keywords

Carbon market mechanisms, Community forestry, Design principles, Forest carbon markets, India

Dates

Published: 2023-10-31 09:31

Last Updated: 2023-10-31 09:31

License

No Creative Commons license

Additional Metadata

Conflict of interest statement:
The authors declare that there are no competing interests that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported.

Data Availability (Reason not available):
Supplementary available with author