This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 2 of this Preprint.
Downloads
Authors
Abstract
All pathways which limit global temperature rise to <2oC above pre-industrial temperatures now require carbon dioxide removal (CDR) in addition to rapid greenhouse gas emissions reductions. Novel and durable CDR strategies need to rapidly scale over the next few decades in order to reach Paris Agreement Targets. Terrestrial enhanced weathering (EW) involves the acceleration of natural weathering processes via the deployment of crushed rock feedstocks, typically Ca- and Mg-rich silicates, in soils. While models predict this has the potential to remove multiple gigatonnes of CO2 annually, as an open-system pathway, the measurement (monitoring), reporting, and verification (MRV) of carbon removal and storage is challenging. Here we provide a review of the current literature showing the state-of-play of different methods for monitoring EW. We focus on geochemical characterization of weathering processes at the weathering site itself, acknowledging that the final storage of carbon is largely in the oceans, with potential losses occurring during transfer. There are two main approaches for measuring EW, one focused on solid phase measurements, including exchangeable phases, and the other on the aqueous phase. Additionally, gas phase measurements have been employed to understand CO2 fluxes, but can be dominated by short-term organic carbon cycling. We stress that, although there is complexity in tracing EW CDR in the natural field environment, established literature validates existing approaches, and each approach has strengths and limitations. The complexity inherent in open-system CDR pathways is navigable through surplus measurement strategies and well designed experiments, which we highlight are critical in the early stage of the EW CDR industry.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31223/X52D7T
Subjects
Physical Sciences and Mathematics
Keywords
enhanced silicate weathering, negative emissions technologies, climate change mitigation, carbon mineralization, MRV, negative emissions technologies, Climate change mitigation, carbon mineralization, MRV
Dates
Published: 2023-11-28 01:41
Last Updated: 2023-12-05 11:24
Older Versions
License
CC BY Attribution 4.0 International
Additional Metadata
Conflict of interest statement:
M. O. Clarkson, C. S. Larkin and P. Swoboda declare that they work for a for-profit company (InPlanet GmbH) deploying enhanced weathering for carbon dioxide removal. J. Campbell sits on the science advisory board for InPlanet.
Data Availability (Reason not available):
No original data
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.