This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.
Downloads
Authors
Abstract
Tea sector is a major contributor to Kenya’s economy through foreign exchange via export. However, extensive amount of energy is required to produce one kilogram of tea, making tea processing energy-intensive. Comparing greenhouse gas emissions from different types of energy consumed in tea factories is imperative to enable policymakers make informed intervention in emission reduction. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions in tea factories is one of the pathways to meeting Kenya’s nationally determined 32% reduction of carbon emissions by 2030 and commitment to the Paris Agreement. This paper assesses greenhouse gas emissions from different sources of energy used in four tea factories in Kenya. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change emission factor is used to calculate the total emissions of each type of energy used for 5 years. Life cycle assessment using simapro software is used to assess the specific compound causing the emission. The findings reveal that the 5-year greenhouse gas emissions by biogas, solar, wood, briquettes, and electricity are 336,111, 7,108, 20,201.06, and 1,338.28 kg CO2/kWh, respectively. Firewood has the highest concentration of carbon dioxide, while solar energy has the least. Analysis of variance confirms significant difference (0.05>p=0.0272) in greenhouse gas emissions from the different energy sources. Post-hoc analyses shows a significant difference in emissions between solar and firewood (p<0.0125) and no significant difference between other sources of energy. Sustainability in the tea sector can be achieved through switching to macadamia briquettes as a source of thermal energy and a combination of electricity and solar for electrical energy.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31223/X5WQ2G
Subjects
Environmental Studies
Keywords
Greenhouse gas emissions, energy mix, Life Cycle Assessment, tea factories, Kenya
Dates
Published: 2023-11-30 21:00
Last Updated: 2023-12-01 01:45
License
CC BY Attribution 4.0 International
Additional Metadata
Data Availability (Reason not available):
The data to support and conclude the findings of this article are included within the article (and its additional files)
Conflict of interest statement:
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.