Never train an LSTM on a single basin

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Frederik Kratzert, Martin Gauch, Daniel Klotz, Grey Nearing 

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) has an increasing role in the hydrological sciences, and in particular, certain types of time series modeling strategies are popular for rainfall-runoff modeling. A large majority of studies that use this type of model do not follow best practices, and there is one mistake in particular that is very common: training deep learning models on small, homogeneous data sets (i.e., data from one or a small number of watersheds). In this position paper, we argue why it is not a good idea to train a Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) model on data from a single watershed. Instead, deep learning streamflow models are best when trained with a large amount of hydrologically diverse data.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/X57090

Subjects

Artificial Intelligence and Robotics, Computer Sciences, Earth Sciences, Hydrology, Physical Sciences and Mathematics

Keywords

hydrology, LSTM, Deep learning, machine learning

Dates

Published: 2023-12-05 01:03

Last Updated: 2023-12-05 06:03

License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International