Shortening and extrusion in the East Anatolian Plateau: how was Neogene Arabia-Europe convergence tectonically accommodated?

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. The published version of this Preprint is available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2024.118827. This is version 3 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Douwe J.J. van Hinsbergen , Derya Gürer, Ayten Koç, Nalan Lom

Abstract

Deformation in orogenic belts is typically widely distributed but may be localized to form discrete, fast-moving fault zones enclosing semi-rigid microplates. An example is the Anatolian microplate, which is extruding westwards from the East Anatolian Plateau in the Arabia-Eurasia collision zone along the North and East Anatolian Faults that cause devastating earthquakes, including the February 6, 2023 Southeast Anatolian earthquakes. Here, we summarize the orogenic architecture of the east Anatolian Plateau and its kinematic history since the Cretaceous, and use this to reconstruct the tectonic situation that existed at the onset of and during the development of the Neogene East Anatolian Plateau and the Anatolian microplate. The orogen first formed in the late Cretaceous by subduction-accretion of microcontinental lithosphere below Neotethys oceanic lithosphere. Then, in Paleogene time, the accretionary orogen underwent regional upper plate extension, causing crystalline crust exhumation and deep-marine basin formation. From early Miocene time onwards, the extended orogen shortened again must have accommodated ~350 km of convergence, making crust up to 45 km thick, and causing >2 km of uplift. Since the ~13 Ma onset of North Anatolian Fault formation, microplate extrusion absorbed no more than (~65 km) of Arabia-Eurasia convergence and even during this time alone, >200 km of convergence must thus have been accommodated by continued ~N-S shortening. We highlight the need for field studies of the East Anatolian Plateau to identify where and how this major shortening was accommodated, what role it played in plateau rise and the onset and dynamics of microplate extrusion, and to better assess seismic hazards.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/X56T1X

Subjects

Physical Sciences and Mathematics

Keywords

Tectonics, Turkey, earthquake, plateau, reconstruction

Dates

Published: 2023-12-21 11:51

Last Updated: 2024-06-03 18:16

Older Versions
License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Conflict of interest statement:
No conflict of interest

Data Availability (Reason not available):
None