This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. The published version of this Preprint is available: https://doi.org/10.3389/esss.2024.10119. This is version 2 of this Preprint.
Downloads
Authors
Abstract
The demographics of environmental and Earth scientists are not representative of the UK’s multicultural society. We sought to widen diversity through two related engaged research projects, 'Walking the Walk' and 'Landscape Stories'. This paper offers a critically reflexive account, based on the methodology of duoethnography, of how we co-constructed a ‘third space’ for these projects. We sought to create the conditions for inclusive leadership informed by connectedness, respect, humility and intentionality. We argue that for environmental and Earth science research to be more equitable and inclusive, members of project teams should be engaged and more representative of wider society. Following this, the work to create third spaces requires: respect for diversity and different forms of expertise, knowledge starting points, power dynamics and esteem; a willingness to make connections across disciplines and sub-cultures, actively listening and learning from different (knowledge) cultures; and a commitment to be respectful of hidden and manifest difference, exploring objectives and gaps in knowledge in more holistic ways.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31223/X5WM46
Subjects
Education, Life Sciences, Physical Sciences and Mathematics
Keywords
Environmental Sciences, Earth Sciences, Duoethnography, Engaged research, critical reflexivity, Third space, Diversity, Representation, Geoscience communication and ethics
Dates
Published: 2024-02-27 01:43
Last Updated: 2024-07-25 06:10
Older Versions
License
CC BY Attribution 4.0 International
Additional Metadata
Conflict of interest statement:
None.
Data Availability (Reason not available):
The data is integrated within the paper.
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.