This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. The published version of this Preprint is available: https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.2249. This is version 2 of this Preprint.
Downloads
Authors
Abstract
Deep-learning (DL) models have become increasingly beneficial for the detection of retrogressive thaw slumps (RTS) in the permafrost domain. However, comparing accuracy metrics is challenging due to unstandardized labeling guidelines. To address this, we conducted an experiment with 12 international domain experts from a broad range of scientific backgrounds. Using 3 m PlanetScope multispectral imagery, they digitized RTS footprints in two sites. We evaluated label uncertainty by comparing manually outlined RTS labels using Intersection-over-Union (IoU) and F1 metrics. At the Canadian Peel Plateau site, we see good agreement, particularly in the active parts of RTS. Differences were observed in the interpretation of the debris tongue and the stable vegetated sections of RTS. At the Russian Bykovsky site, we observed a larger mismatch. Here, the same differences were documented, but several participants mistakenly identified non-RTS features. This emphasizes the importance of site-specific knowledge for reliable label creation. The experiment highlights the need for standardized labeling procedures and definition of their scientific purpose. The most similar expert labels outperformed the accuracy metrics reported in the literature, highlighting human labeling capabilities with proper training, site knowledge, and clear guidelines. These findings lay the groundwork for DL-based RTS monitoring in the pan-Arctic.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31223/X55M4P
Subjects
Physical Sciences and Mathematics
Keywords
Deep learning, Remote Sensing, uncertainty estimation, Permafrost, hillslope thermokarst, retrogressive thaw slumps, remote sensing, Uncertainty Estimation, Permafrost, hillslope thermokarst
Dates
Published: 2024-04-05 09:34
Last Updated: 2024-10-21 14:31
Older Versions
License
Additional Metadata
Conflict of interest statement:
None
Data Availability (Reason not available):
Code: https://github.com/initze/RTSIn_experiment (Repository will be made publically available, after final publication). Data: Due to licensing restrictions, we are not allowed to publicly share the commercial PlanetScope input data sources.
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.