This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 2 of this Preprint.
Downloads
Authors
Abstract
The field of geochemistry has grown significantly over the past seventy years, contributing to our understanding of Earth's processes. However, geochemists often identify with broader fields like geology or oceanography, reflecting an identity crisis within the discipline. The Goldschmidt Conference, established in 1988, serves as a central international meeting for geochemists, promoting their professional identity and providing a platform for scientific exchange. Despite its success, participation has historically been dominated by attendees from North America and Western Europe, with men and established scientists overrepresented. Efforts to increase diversity and inclusion have included the introduction of the AMIGo initiative, a code of conduct, and specific sessions on equity, diversity, and inclusion. Hybrid conference formats have improved accessibility, especially for students and scientists from lower-income countries. However, the high costs of attendance and stringent visa requirements remain barriers. Future strategies for inclusivity include selecting conference venues outside the Global North, providing gender-neutral facilities, and reassessing alcohol policies to create a more welcoming environment. Ensuring equitable access and maintaining a balance between social and environmental responsibilities are essential for the continued success and inclusivity of the Goldschmidt Conference.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31223/X57M5P
Subjects
Biogeochemistry, Cosmochemistry, Earth Sciences, Geochemistry, Planetary Biogeochemistry, Planetary Geochemistry, Planetary Sciences
Keywords
geochemistry, Conference, Inclusion, Diversity, Equity
Dates
Published: 2024-06-19 14:42
Last Updated: 2024-06-19 23:21
Older Versions
License
CC BY Attribution 4.0 International
Additional Metadata
Conflict of interest statement:
None
Data Availability (Reason not available):
All data are provided in the article
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.