The sensitivity of lowermost mantle anisotropy to past mantle convection

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

James A Ward, Andrew Walker , Andy Nowacki , James Panton , J. Huw Davies 

Abstract

It is widely believed that seismic anisotropy in the lowermost mantle is caused by the flow-induced alignment of anisotropic crystals such as post-perovskite. What is unclear, however, is whether the anisotropy observations in the lowermost mantle hold information about past mantle flow, or if they only inform us about the present-day flow field. To investigate this, we compare the general and seismic anisotropy calculated using Earth-like mantle convection models where one has a time-varying flow, and another where the present-day flow is constant throughout time. To do this, we track a post-perovskite polycrystal through the flow fields and calculate texture development using the sampled strain rate and the visco-plastic self-consistent approach. As texture development also depends on the slip systems assumed, we compare the results of the flow fields under three ease-of-texturing slip system test cases. We compare the radial anisotropy parameters and the anisotropic components of the elastic tensors produced by the flow field test cases at the same location. We find, under all ease-of-texturing cases, the radial anisotropy is very similar (difference < 2%) in the majority of locations and in some regions, the difference can be very large (> 10%). The same is true when comparing the elastic tensors directly. Varying the ease-of-texture development in the crystal aggregate suggests that easier-to-texture material may hold a stronger signal from past flow than harder-to-texture material. Our results imply that broad-scale observations of seismic anisotropy such as those from seismic tomography, 1-D estimates and normal mode observations, will be mainly sensitive to present-day flow. Shear-wave splitting measurements, however, could hold information about past mantle flow. In general, mantle memory expressed in anisotropy may be dependent on path length in the post-perovskite stability field. Our work implies that, as knowledge of the exact causative mechanism of lowermost mantle anisotropy develops, we may be able to constrain both present-day and past mantle convection.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/X5VD7Z

Subjects

Geophysics and Seismology, Mineral Physics

Keywords

lowermost mantle, anisotropy, mantle flow, Shear wave splitting, core-mantle boundary

Dates

Published: 2024-06-20 16:15

Last Updated: 2024-06-20 20:15

License

CC-By Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Data Availability (Reason not available):
Convection models are currently emargoed as part of a wider funded project. Texture data and elastic constants will become available once the final version of the paper is accepted following peer review.