A Systematic Review of Neural Network Applications for Groundwater Level Prediction

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 2 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Samuel K. Afful, Cyril Dziedzorm Boateng, Emmanuel Ahene, Jeffery Nii Armah Aryee, David D. Wemegah, Solomon S.R. Gidigasu, Akyana Britwum, Marian A. Osei, Jesse Gilbert , Haoulata Touré, Vera Mensah

Abstract

Physical models have long been employed for groundwater level (GWL) prediction. Recently, artificial intelligence (AI), particularly neural networks (NNs), have gained widespread use in forecasting GWL. Forecasting of GWL is essential to enable analyze, quantify and manage groundwater. This systematic review investigates the application of NNs for GWL prediction, focusing on the architectures of the various NN models employed. The study utilizes the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) methodology to screen and synthesize relevant scientific article. Various NN architectures, such as artificial neural networks (ANNs), feedforward neural networks (FFNNs), backpropagation neural networks (BPNNs), long short-term memory (LSTM), and hybrid models, were analyzed. The results from the systematic review indicates a growing preference for hybrid models, which are effective in capturing hidden relationships between GWL and environmental factors. The root mean square error (RMSE) emerges as the predominant performance metrics, highlighting its significance in evaluating NNs. Results from the review also highlights the significance of comprehensive, long-term datasets covering a decade for a robust trend analyses and accurate predictions. The findings, contribute to a deeper understanding of new trends in groundwater research such as the application of neural networks for prediction problems in groundwater research. In conclusion, hybrid metaheuristic algorithm produced more efficient results emphasizing their efficacy. In addition, lagged values were essential input for GWL prediction. The paper, addressed both technical nuances and broader environmental implications

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/X5VX1V

Subjects

Engineering, Physical Sciences and Mathematics

Keywords

Groundwater level prediction, neural networks (NNs), Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), Groundwater Level (GWL) Forecasting, Climate Variables

Dates

Published: 2024-07-30 18:02

Last Updated: 2024-10-20 16:19

Older Versions
License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International