Deforestation – a call for consistent carbon accounting

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Gerard Wedderburn-Bisshop

Abstract

Carbon accounting conventions treat emissions differently depending on their source. Fossil fuel carbon emissions are assessed as gross, whereas anthropogenic land carbon emissions are assessed as net. Despite calls for consistent gross accounting, accounting guidelines remain unchanged. Here we consolidate arguments for consistent accounting and explore implications for national inventories, sector contributions, carbon markets and programs aimed at reducing deforestation and supporting forest protection.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/X5R711

Subjects

Physical Sciences and Mathematics

Keywords

LULUCF; FOLU; deforestation emissions; avoided deforestation; emission sectors.

Dates

Published: 2024-08-01 20:38

Last Updated: 2024-08-02 03:38

License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Conflict of interest statement:
The author is biased against industrial scale deforestation, having witnessed first-hand the destruction of 11 square km of forest and woodland each day while monitoring deforestation for the Queensland government. This did influence the study topic, however every effort was made to make sure my personal judgement was unbiased.

Data Availability (Reason not available):
Data is published by others.