This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. The published version of this Preprint is available: https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219876224500294. This is version 1 of this Preprint.
Downloads
Authors
Abstract
To develop a numerical method for global geophysical fluids, we usually need to choose a spherical grid and numerical approximations to represent the partial derivative equations. Some alternatives include the use of finite differences or finite volumes with latitude-longitude or reduced grids. Each of these cases has some advantages and also some limitations. This paper presents a comparison between two methods and numerical tests with a composite model using them side by side. The first is a well-known method for latitude-longitude grids that was used from 75ºS until 75ºN. The second is a recently developed scheme for reduced grids that was used only in the polar regions. The similarity between these two methods allows a smooth transition in these two regions. Numerical tests with the composite model indicated order 2 of convergence, prevention of grid-imprinting errors, and a combination of the advantages of both schemes. The composite model has numerical properties that may lead to efficient implementations with massive parallel computation.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31223/X5T13B
Subjects
Applied Mathematics, Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology, Physical Sciences and Mathematics
Keywords
global reduced grids, finite differences, finite volumes, shallow-water equations, conservation, consistency
Dates
Published: 2024-08-07 20:46
Last Updated: 2024-08-08 03:46
License
CC BY Attribution 4.0 International
Additional Metadata
Conflict of interest statement:
None
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.