Critical Review of the Article: "Evidence of Dark Oxygen Production at the Abyssal Seafloor" by Sweetman et al. in Nat. Geosci. 1–3 (2024)

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. The published version of this Preprint is available: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.30239.37289. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Lars-Kristian Lunde Trellevik, Alden Denny, Werner Svellingen

Abstract

This review examines the findings and methodologies presented in Sweetman et al. (2024) (hereafter referred to as ‘the paper’). The paper presents findings contrasting those of all previous comparable work and has stirred international debate pertaining to deep-sea minerals. We identify significant issues in data collection, validation, and interpretation including unvalidated data collection methods, the omission of crucial observations relevant for electrolysis processes, and unsupported voltage measurements which undermine the study's conclusions. These issues, coupled with unfounded hypotheses about early Earth oxygen production, call into question the authors’ interpretation of the observations and warrant re-examining the validity of this work. Our analysis is driven by scientific curiosity of mineral related processes, as our company has no vested interests in nodule production.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/X5N98F

Subjects

Geochemistry

Keywords

Deep Sea Mining, Dark Oxygen, Nodules, Marine Minerals

Dates

Published: 2024-08-12 03:50

Last Updated: 2024-08-12 10:50

License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International