This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c64c6/c64c6bf6e1874074b32896073c9664a25f92aef4" alt="Most Landfill Methane Emissions Escape Detection in EPA21 Surface Emission Monitoring Surveys"
Downloads
Authors
Abstract
We measured emissions from ten landfills using mobile surveys and Surface Emission Monitoring (SEM) to determine what fraction of emissions that be identified by SEM surveys. Using mobile methane measurements and a back-trajectory attribution and rate estimation method, we measured overall site emissions and those of individual landfill components (active face, closed cells, leachate, etc). We evaluated each component’s contribution to the total emissions and compared how much of emissions captured by mobile surveys could be covered by the walking SEM survey. We found that SEM was effective for closed sites, achieving on-average 67% rate coverage. However, SEM missed relevant emission sources at open landfill sites, most notably from the active face, reducing its rate percent coverage to 17% or. The limited rate coverage of SEM suggests that using SEM alone is insufficient for measurement-informed management of total landfill emissions. We recommend that SEM be augmented by other methods to fill monitoring gaps and provide a more comprehensive assessment of landfill methane emissions.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31223/X55T54
Subjects
Engineering, Life Sciences
Keywords
Landfill methane emission, surface emission monitoring, Gaussian dispersion, methane, regulation, mobile methane survey.
Dates
Published: 2025-02-05 10:41
Last Updated: 2025-02-05 16:41
License
CC-By Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.