Planetary health security?: critical scoping review of conceptual linkages between ‘health security’ and ‘planetary health’

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Supplementary Files
Authors

Max D LÓPEZ TOLEDANO, Amanda Low , Matthew Aviso, Sze Tung Lam , Katrina JACINTO, Mishael HYAT AYUB, Natasha Howard 

Abstract

Background
‘Health security’ — the subjection of health to ‘security’ frameworks — and ‘planetary health’— the study of human health impacts of the degradation of planetary ecosystems — have emerged in the last decades as prominent global health fields. However, limited literature connects them, particularly incorporating critical perspectives. We explored interactions between these approaches conceptually, institutionally, and empirically, aiming to chart a conceptual genealogy of these interactions.
 
Methods
We conducted a scoping review using Arksey and O’Malley’s method and Levac’s revisions, exploring the health, security, and ecology literatures. We identified 75 eligible sources of 10,352 screened and synthesised findings inductively using Braun and Clarke’s thematic approach.
 
Findings
We generated five themes across these literatures: (1) environmental health as security issue; (2) biosecurity and non-traditional security; (3) institutional connections; (4) militarisation and environmental health; and (5) emerging risk-management methods and technologies. We found multiple descriptions of environmental health as ‘crisis’ and ‘security’ issue, yet health security’s scope was primarily limited to containing emerging infectious diseases, rather than prevention or broader health concerns.
 
Conclusion
This initial exploration across disciplinary literatures of conceptual interactions between planetary health and health security showed both mobilising the language of ‘security’ to frame health issues, while raising concerns over inequitable experiences for some populations resulting from this framing. An overt emphasis on containment over prevention and tacit commitments to the protection of some lives over others could result in asymmetrical health experiences, rendering some geographies and populations ‘sacrificial’ in their health risks.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/X5HT57

Subjects

Public Health

Keywords

Securitisation, global health, One Health, health security, biosecurity

Dates

Published: 2025-02-28 21:46

Last Updated: 2025-03-01 05:46

License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Data Availability (Reason not available):
All data are publicly available.

Conflict of interest statement:
None declared.