Skip to main content
Impact of GHG mitigation measures in sanitation service chains: A focus on septic tanks and sewers

Impact of GHG mitigation measures in sanitation service chains: A focus on septic tanks and sewers

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. The published version of this Preprint is available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2025.124618. This is version 4 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Jakpong Moonkawin , Mariane Schneider, Shigeo Fujii, Hidenari Yasui, Viet-Anh Nguyen, Anh N. Pham, Shinya Echigo, Hidenori Harada

Abstract

Sanitation service chains (SSCs) often consist of a complex mix of different components, frequently involving the coexistence of non-sewered sanitation (e.g., septic tanks) and sewered sanitation. Poorly-maintained components within these chains can lead to substantial, yet potentially avoidable greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. In this study, we developed a model for estimating the impact of GHG mitigation measures along SSCs that feature overlapping and poorly maintained non-sewered and sewered sanitation, taking the interdependencies of the GHG emissions of these components into account. To this end, we employed mass balance, empirical emission equations, and a carbon footprint estimation model to estimate GHG emissions by component at baseline and under four mitigation scenarios using an example SSC in Hanoi. The results showed that the SSC is predominantly methane-emitting, with poorly-maintained septic tanks and sewers being the primary contributors to the GHG emissions. Annual septic tank emptying was also identified as an effective strategy for reducing GHG emissions and it accounted for a 31–38 % decline in total emissions relative to baseline emission level. Scenario comparison further showed that removing septic tanks and upgrading sewers, even though associated with a slight increase in N2O emissions from the wastewater treatment plant, offer the greatest long-term mitigation potential, yielding 15–24 % lower emissions than annual emptying septic tanks with sewer upgrades. Additionally, if septic tanks are not removed, they will remain the primary source of GHG emissions even after upgraded sewer and centralized treatment is established. However, in cases where septic tank removal poses social challenges, frequent emptying remained a robust and immediately applicable mitigation option. Overall, this study provides a framework for identifying and quantifying major GHG emission reduction strategies for complex SSCs. Additionally, the results obtained indicated that managing septic tanks and sewers are important climate action strategies for ensuring sustainable city-wide inclusive sanitation.


DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/X5ZH9P

Subjects

Environmental Engineering, Environmental Monitoring, Sustainability

Keywords

septic tanks, GHG estimation, urban wastewater management, GHG mitigation, sanitation service chains

Dates

Published: 2025-03-26 14:15

Last Updated: 2025-10-08 09:02

Older Versions

License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Conflict of interest statement:
None