Skip to main content
Institutional barriers to food safety in the urban irrigated vegetable value chain in Accra, Ghana

Institutional barriers to food safety in the urban irrigated vegetable value chain in Accra, Ghana

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

David Galibourg , Rebecca E. Scott, Katherine V. Gough , Philip Amoah

Abstract

The faecal contamination of irrigation water threatens public health. Although safe practices can mitigate hygiene and food safety risks along the urban irrigated vegetable value chain, their adoption remains limited. A behaviour framework was combined with a participatory approach to explore how institutions influence farmers’ capability, opportunity and motivation to adopt safe practices in Accra, Ghana. After extensive preparation, a dialogue engaged stakeholders and institutions in identifying the actors and interactions influencing stakeholder practices. We find that institutional dynamics hinder farmers’ opportunity and motivation to adopt safe practices. Knowledge gaps created by top-down approaches and sectoral silos were bridged by engaging participants in conducting the behavioural diagnosis. This shared understanding enables participants to co-design arrangements that make safe practices easier to adopt.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/X5C43B

Subjects

Environmental Studies

Keywords

sanitation, urban agri-food systems, multiple barrier approach, risk management, COM-B, Companion Modelling

Dates

Published: 2025-04-26 05:21

Last Updated: 2025-04-26 05:21

License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Data Availability (Reason not available):
The data is available in the Loughborough repository on the following link:https://doi.org/10.17028/rd.lboro.28827659

Conflict of interest statement:
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have influenced the work reported in this paper.