This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. The published version of this Preprint is available: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pwat.0000378. This is version 2 of this Preprint.
Institutional barriers to food safety: The irrigated vegetable value chain in Accra, Ghana
Downloads
Authors
Abstract
The faecal contamination of irrigation water threatens public health. Although safe practices can mitigate hygiene and food safety risks along the urban irrigated vegetable value chain, their adoption remains limited. A behaviour framework was combined with a participatory approach to explore how institutions influence stakeholders’ capability, opportunity and motivation to adopt safe practices in Accra, Ghana. After extensive preparation, a dialogue engaged stakeholders and institutions in identifying the actors and interactions influencing stakeholder practices. We found that institutional dynamics and misaligned priorities hinder stakeholders’ opportunity and motivation to adopt safe practices, while their capability (education and skills) is not actively hindered. Knowledge gaps created by top-down approaches and sectoral silos were bridged by engaging participants in conducting the behavioural diagnosis. This shared understanding highlights the need to integrate and harmonise policies, regulations and service provision across water, sanitation, agriculture and health sectors, enabling participants to co-design arrangements that make safe practices easier to adopt.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31223/X5C43B
Subjects
Environmental Studies
Keywords
sanitation, urban agri-food systems, multiple barrier approach, risk management, COM-B, Companion Modelling
Dates
Published: 2025-04-26 05:21
Last Updated: 2025-11-24 11:48
Older Versions
License
CC BY Attribution 4.0 International
Additional Metadata
Data Availability (Reason not available):
The data is available in the Loughborough repository on the following link:https://doi.org/10.17028/rd.lboro.28827659
Conflict of interest statement:
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have influenced the work reported in this paper.
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.