Skip to main content
Comparative analysis of the stage-discharge rating operated in gradual varied flows with alternative streamflow monitoring approaches

Comparative analysis of the stage-discharge rating operated in gradual varied flows with alternative streamflow monitoring approaches

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Marian Muste, Kyeongdong Kim, Dongsu Kim, Ibrahim Demir

Abstract

Streamflow data derived from stage-discharge (HQRC) are reported without uncertainty compelling users to treat them as absolute and deterministic. However, ignoring uncertainty is no longer viable, as data users increasingly demand confidence in measurements - especially for cross-agency comparisons and scientific or legal scrutiny. This paper investigates a major factor affecting the accuracy of HQRC data: hysteresis caused by ubiquitous gradually varied flows (GVFs). Although hydrometric agencies apply costly corrections or use other methods to account for this effect, assessing their effectiveness is challenging and largely unknown. Consequently, most HQRC stations operate without accounting for hysteresis-induced error. Motivated by the lack of comparisons between data produced during GVFs by HQRC, HQRC corrections, and multi-variate monitoring methods, this paper evaluates the performance of several methods from each category applied to a range of flows at three gaging stations. Besides quantifying the HQRC uncertainty, we provide guidelines to properly account for it.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/X52Q7X

Subjects

Engineering, Physical Sciences and Mathematics

Keywords

streamflow monitoring, stage-discharge rating, index-velocity method, slope-area method, gradually varied flows, Hysteresis

Dates

Published: 2025-04-30 10:22

Last Updated: 2025-04-30 10:22

License

CC-By Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Conflict of interest statement:
None

Data Availability (Reason not available):
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.