Skip to main content
Aligning emissions with decisionmaking: estimating urban contributions to global carbon dioxide emissions

Aligning emissions with decisionmaking: estimating urban contributions to global carbon dioxide emissions

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 3 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Ying Yu, Diego Manya, Angel Hsu

Abstract

Urban areas are widely viewed as central to the global carbon challenge, yet estimates of the urban contribution to global CO2 emissions vary substantially because studies define “urban” and allocate emissions using different boundaries and accounting perspectives. We address this challenge by introducing a globally consistent, administrative-boundary framework that aligns emissions with governance units and distinguishes urban centres, peri-urban areas, and rural areas across all subnational administrative divisions worldwide. This governance-aligned classification provides a consistent basis for urban emissions typologies, enabling comparable urban emission quantification across regions and accounting perspectives. Combining high-resolution territorial emissions inventories (EDGAR, ODIAC, CEDS) with global consumption-based footprints (GGMCF), we estimate that in 2022 urban jurisdictions (urban centres + peri-urban areas) account for 72-76% of global territorial CO2 emissions, with urban centres contributing 30-37% and 39-42% from peri-urban areas. Using consumption-based data, we estimate that urban areas account for ~82% of CO2 emissions in 2015. We further show that the sectoral composition of urban territorial emissions has shifted from 1970 to 2022, with the energy sector increasing in prominence and relative contributions from buildings and industry declining. Finally, comparing territorial and consumption-based estimates across subnational units, we map consumption–production imbalances and find that 63% of regions are net embodied-emissions importers. These results provide a critical update to global assessments of urban emissions and demonstrate the value of pairing territorial and consumption-based accounting on governance-relevant boundaries for interpreting responsibility and identifying mitigation leverage points.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/X5PB02

Subjects

Social and Behavioral Sciences

Keywords

Urban emissions, urban-rural classification, urban climate mitigation and planning

Dates

Published: 2025-05-09 08:30

Last Updated: 2026-03-17 19:48

Older Versions

License

CC-By Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Conflict of interest statement:
None

Metrics

Views: 2132

Downloads: 375