Skip to main content
Users of a Container-Based Sanitation Service Experience High Sanitation-Related Quality of Life: A Prospective Cohort Study in Cap Haitien, Haiti

Users of a Container-Based Sanitation Service Experience High Sanitation-Related Quality of Life: A Prospective Cohort Study in Cap Haitien, Haiti

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Supplementary Files

Authors

Maya Lubeck-Schricker , Miselie Fanor Pierre, Bridj Ozeris, Karen Levy 

Abstract

Sanitation users often value improved sanitation interventions for social benefits, such as improved safety and dignity. Some sanitation providers have started using well-being measurements to evaluate service impacts beyond infectious disease outcomes. In particular, the Sanitation Quality of Life (SanQoL) Index explores five attributes associated with sanitation wellbeing: health, disgust, shame, safety, and privacy. In this prospective cohort study we assess changes to sanitation-related quality of life among users of the EkoLakay container-based sanitation (CBS) service operating in northern Haiti.
EkoLakay staff surveyed baseline SanQoL among all households who expressed interest in joining the service. For households who proceeded with joining, follow-up visits were conducted >4 weeks after installation to determine endline SanQoL. Between October 2023 and November 2024 EkoLakay gathered complete baseline and endline data from 291 customer households. Each SanQoL response was scored between 0 (worst) and 3 (best). The difference between baseline and endline SanQoL overall and attribute-specific scores were calculated for each household and changes to their sanitation-related quality of life were assessed using paired t-tests. Multivariate regression controlling for socio-economic factors were conducted to explore how prior sanitation access is associated with changes to sanitation-related quality of life.
The mean difference in cumulative SanQoL score between baseline and endline was 7.88 (95% CI: 7.32-8.45), representing a substantial overall improvement after joining the CBS service. Households who practiced open defecation prior to joining EkoLakay experienced the greatest improvement in SanQoL scores (mean difference 10.22, 95% CI: 9.42-11.03).
This research suggests that CBS is associated with substantially higher quality of life of users in northern Haiti, particularly among the most vulnerable who did not previously have access to any sanitation facility. The results also support the use of measurements such as SanQoL, that explore improvements to users’ wellbeing, when evaluating the overall impact of sanitation interventions.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/X5VQ72

Subjects

Public Health

Keywords

dignity, Impact evaluation, vulnerable populations, Prospective cohort study, Sanitation access, Haiti, Sanitation intervention, health, Shame, disgust, sanitation, safety, Privacy, Open defecation, Well-Being, SanQoL Index, Sanitation Quality of Life, cbs, Container-based sanitation

Dates

Published: 2025-05-25 00:01

Last Updated: 2025-05-25 00:01

License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Data Availability (Reason not available):
The de-identified data analyzed in this study can be found at the following website: https://data.humdata.org/dataset/haiti-cbs-sanitation-quality-of-life

Conflict of interest statement:
MLS was employed by SOIL as a consultant for unrelated research activities and did not receive funding for the work presented in this study. MFP and BO are full-time employees of SOIL’s Research and Innovation team and helped arrange and supervise data collection. KL served as a scientific advisor to SOIL from 2006-2009. These affiliations are disclosed in the interest of transparency. The authors declare that this does not alter their adherence to PLOS Water policies on sharing data and materials, and they affirm that the research was conducted objectively and independently.