This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

More than a buzzword? Mapping interpretations of the 'polycrisis'
Downloads
Authors
Abstract
“Polycrisis” leapt from Davos into everyday policy talk, yet its meaning remains fluid and sometimes contradictory. To take stock, we asked fifty experts to sort key statements, and Q-method analysis revealed four distinct framings. All agree that polycrisis spills across sectors and borders and reject the view that polycrisis is a mere buzzword. They diverge, however, on how much faith to place in current knowledge systems and on polycrisis’ drivers. Connecting these findings to Edgar Morin’s crisology recasts polycrisis as a metamorphic hinge where crisis and transformation intertwine. A forward agenda must therefore be historically grounded, relational, and reflexive: tracing feedbacks and power relations together, and welcoming plural knowledges. Morin’s principe de reliance also points to governance that is anticipatory, participatory, and cross-scalar. Taken together, the study shows that polycrisis is not a passing label but a fertile lens for understanding entangled planetary upheavals.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31223/X5QB1R
Subjects
Social and Behavioral Sciences
Keywords
Polycrisis, Morin, Q-method, sustainability, transformation, systemic risk
Dates
Published: 2025-07-02 22:44
Last Updated: 2025-07-02 22:44
License
CC-By Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Additional Metadata
Conflict of interest statement:
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.