">
Skip to main content
Glacier or Not? The Importance of Nuance in Definitions of Vanishing Glaciers

Glacier or Not? The Importance of Nuance in Definitions of Vanishing Glaciers

This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 2 of this Preprint.

Add a Comment

You must log in to post a comment.


Comments

There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.

Downloads

Download Preprint

Authors

Allen Pope 

Abstract

Glaciers provide critical ecosystem services, including water resources, biodiversity, cultural value, and climate signals. But what makes a glacier a glacier? Dierent definitions of what characterizes a glacier can conflict with each other. While a common definition emphasizes "past or present flow," practical applications involve various criteria like currently observable ice flow, crevassing, minimum thickness, minimum area, surficial features related to hydrology and/or debris cover, or relative size. Increasingly, glacier inventories are applying multiple criteria, acknowledging the nuanced, continuous nature of glacier retreat rather than a binary status. In the context of increasingly melting, shrinking, and vanishing glaciers, it is important to explore glacier definitions and their application. Ultimately, the glacier definition applied depends on the specific context, purpose, and audience. This also highlights the need for careful language choice, clear communication, and localized expertise in considering glacier loss.

DOI

https://doi.org/10.31223/X5GQ81

Subjects

Physical Sciences and Mathematics

Keywords

glaciers, climate change, Cryosphere

Dates

Published: 2025-07-07 09:06

Last Updated: 2025-09-09 11:36

Older Versions

License

CC BY Attribution 4.0 International

Additional Metadata

Data Availability (Reason not available):
N/A - Review Paper