This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 1 of this Preprint.

Navigating Rising Waters: Empowering Shunganunga Creek Floodplain Communities through Protection Motivation Theory
Downloads
Authors
Abstract
In communities like those near Topeka’s Shunganunga Creek, where flooding is a frequent and expected part of life, risk communication must adapt to meet the unique circumstances of residents. To understand how people in this floodplain perceive risk and respond to flood warnings, we interviewed 11 residents, guided by principles from Protection Motivation Theory. Participants, including long-time community members and local educators, shared how they perceive risk messages and make protective decisions during flood events. We identified key communication barriers through qualitative thematic analysis, including distrust of official sources, accessibility issues, and reliance on social networks for information. Our study highlights that official warnings emphasize scientific accuracy but do not always align with how at-risk populations interpret and respond to risk. Traditional top-down communication strategies often struggle to account for the localized needs of communities, leading to disregard and inaction from residents. We recommend tailoring flood risk communication to be clear and relatable, addressing the unique circumstances of floodplain communities. Shifting toward community-centered outreach, incorporating trusted local figures, assistance information, and cultural relevance will strengthen resilience against future flooding in a changing climate.
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31223/X51B2X
Subjects
Atmospheric Sciences, Environmental Studies, Meteorology, Social and Behavioral Sciences
Keywords
flooding, Risk Perception, floodplain, Communication, protection motivation theory
Dates
Published: 2025-07-25 04:48
Last Updated: 2025-07-25 04:48
License
CC-By Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Additional Metadata
Conflict of interest statement:
The authors report there are no competing interests to declare.
Data Availability (Reason not available):
Due to Institutional Review Board protocols and ethical considerations related to working with a specific vulnerable population, the data collected for this study cannot be publicly shared. Participants were assured anonymity, and data access is restricted to protect their privacy.
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.