This is a Preprint and has not been peer reviewed. This is version 2 of this Preprint.

Quantum Entropy & Probabilistic Clustering for Uncertainty-Aware Groundwater Quality Assessment in Geochemically Complex Terrains of Eastern India
Downloads
Authors
Abstract
Groundwater quality assessment in geochemically heterogeneous regions is often constrained by deterministic models that overlook spatial variability, inter-parameter dependencies, and system uncertainty. This study proposes a novel Quantum Entropy-based Groundwater Quality Index (QEGWI), which leverages von Neumann entropy derived from quantum density matrices to weight hydrogeochemical parameters based on multivariate uncertainty dynamically. Applied to a five-year dataset from 1,280 monitoring sites across Odisha, India, QEGWI demonstrated superior sensitivity, spatial resolution, and robustness compared to conventional and Shannon entropy-based indices. Sensitivity analysis revealed fluoride (F⁻) and sodium (Na⁺) as the dominant pollutants (Sobol index > 0.35), while Monte Carlo simulations confirmed model stability (σ ± 0.14). To complement this, a Quantum Probabilistic Clustering (QPC) framework was introduced, modelling groundwater sites as quantum states and utilising fidelity-based soft classification. Five risk-based clusters were identified with high intra-cluster coherence (fidelity > 0.85) and transitional zones showing uncertainty > 0.25. Together, QEGWI and QPC offer a scalable, uncertainty-aware framework that bridges quantum information theory with environmental risk assessment for hydro geologically complex systems. Key Words: Quantum Entropy, Groundwater Quality Assessment, Quantum Probabilistic Clustering, Hydrogeochemical Risk Zonation
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31223/X5BM8R
Subjects
Education, Physical Sciences and Mathematics
Keywords
Quantum entropy, groundwater quality assessment, quantum probabilistic clustering
Dates
Published: 2025-07-25 10:29
Last Updated: 2025-07-25 10:29
Older Versions
License
CC BY Attribution 4.0 International
Additional Metadata
Conflict of interest statement:
No conflict of interest
There are no comments or no comments have been made public for this article.