Geological CO2 Storage in Poland: Review of Sequestration Potential, Policy Development, and Socio-Economic Factors

Mohammad Nooraiepour , Karol Dąbrowski, Mohammad Masoudi, Szymon Kuczyński, Zezhang Song, Ane Elisabet Lothe, Helge Hellevang

Poland's coal-reliant economy faces challenges in meeting European Union climate mandates. Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) is pivotal for decarbonizing high-emission sectors (e.g., cement, chemicals, refineries, and steel), enabling substantial CO_2 emission reductions while sustaining industrial competitiveness. This multidisciplinary review assesses Poland's CO_2 storage potential, integrating geological, regulatory, and socio-economic analyses to evaluate large-scale CCS feasibility. Onshore saline aquifers alongside depleted hydrocarbon fields offer significant storage potential, with offshore Baltic Basin sites constrained by logistical and environmental regulations, including the Helsinki Convention. Evolving policy and regulatory framework is evaluated, including recent amendments to the Geological and Mining Law that may facilitate onshore CO_2 storage near industrial hubs. We analyze regional and data compilation constraints, infrastructure readiness, and the integration of the CCUS value chain. It was found that current storage assessments face challenges, including sparse data, restricted research access, and limited industry-academia collaboration, which impede maturing basin-scale and site-specific analyses to higher storage readiness levels. These gaps introduce significant uncertainty and undermine reliability, which limits informed business decisions. Socio-economic barriers, including public skepticism, financial uncertainties, and regulatory gaps, hinder large-scale CCS deployment, necessitating transparent engagement. A framework for building public trust through transparent governance, inclusive community engagement, and proactive risk communication was suggested to build trust and foster CCS acceptance in Poland. Proactive stakeholder involvement and transparent risk communication, particularly in coal-dependent communities, are critical.